Playclaw makes their money on being a recording (and now streaming software) that is the least detrimental to your fps and game experience.
PLAYCLAW 5 PLUS FREE
If you want Chromakey while streaming, and you hate the idea of using OBS (Which is free and better for streaming) you have to get over it. If you really want Chromakey in recorded video, record the webcam as part of your game footage, then in your editing software, depending on which one, use their chromakey function. There are several rendering programs that pass off streaming video and audio after post production. "Streaming does not have post-production" Actually yes it does. I got this when it first released on Steam because it was pitched as planned for Streaming but I found that FRAPS does capture better and even with streaming added, the approach they are using for this will never work sufficiently as a streaming application.
PLAYCLAW 5 PLUS FULL
and I don't know about too much CPU usage, as there are plenty of video streaming applications out there that do it while streaming and capturing the video all at the same time, and frankly a streaming application that can also record is much much more full featured than this, which is a capture program that can supposedly stream and lacks almost all the screen/scene editing features that even the most basic streaming software requires to be taken serious. Pla圜law supposedly has streaming support now, and Streaming does not have post-production because it's done live, thus all the reason in the world to include a Chromakey function in the software itself, along with other editing and scene setting features that you would normally consider post-production features. Witcher 3 and Dying Light have around one fps capture rate.Originally posted by a2mAlthrin: Chromakey is done post production anyway, why would they include that in the recording. Metro Redux, Battlefield 4, and Wolfenstein: The New Order (which did not work for me with playclaw) work flawless with only ambibox, still in full screen, and BF 4 and Metro Redux still use my two cards (W:TNO does not support crossfire).
PLAYCLAW 5 PLUS UPDATE
Ambibox already uses 15% of my CPU, even on desktop, but with an update for ambibox for Windows 10 it would probably become more optimal :) With metro 2033 Redux/Metro Last Light Redux, which are both very light on your CPU, I get smooth capturing while full screen with ambibox alone. When I play Dying Light or Witcher 3, which both use quite a lot of CPU power, I get the 1 fps capture. Maybe the speed has increased because this is an old game/uses less resources/only uses one GPU? PS I also played the Chronicles of Riddick, and with this game I got, in full screen with ambibox on, a smooth experience with lightpack, so not 1 fps. Maybe Windows 10 combines full screen with some properties of borderless full screen? Maybe we will see more progress on this (more fps captured by ambibox for smoothness) in the future! Meanwhile, my Lightpack was reacting to the game! I checked this with other games and the same there! Although the adapting of the lights captured at like 1 frame per second, this indicates a for us very positive change. Then I started a game (witcher 3) and it was in full screen (positive, checked it multiple times, also there was GPU usage on both my GPU' s, something which only happens in full screen). Something interesting happened: I had Ambibox on for desktop.
0 kommentar(er)
